Drone Protocols vs. Smart Drone Battery Protocols: Differences and Compatibility Analysis

Drone Battery

ENOV High-Energy drone batteries power industrial and commercial drones. Delivering 220–320 Wh/kg energy density, they enable long flight times (30+ mins) and support fast charging (2C). Perfect for aerial photography, surveillance, and delivery drones.

This article will briefly introduce drone protocols, smart drone battery protocols, and the specific differences between them.

1. What is a drone protocol? What are the common protocols?

A drone protocol is a “rule system” for communication between a drone and its controller, on-board devices (such as sensors and motors), and external systems (such as ground stations and other drones). It specifies the encoding, transmission, and parsing methods of data, ensuring that various devices can “understand” each other’s commands and status information.

According to their functions, common protocols are divided into four categories:

① Radio control protocols: Responsible for transmitting control signals between the drone and the remote controller. Examples include the basic PWM (suitable for entry-level drones, requiring separate wiring), SBUS with strong anti-interference capability (transmitting multi-channel signals via a single wire, used in aerial photography and racing drones), and CRSF with long-distance and low-latency performance (for professional-grade remote control).

Flight control and data interaction protocols: Support data exchange between internal devices of the drone. For instance, the open-source MAVLink (used for two-way communication in autonomous drones, such as agricultural plant protection drones) and UAVCAN/DroneCAN, which supports simultaneous communication of multiple devices (ensuring stable flight of complex drones).

② General communication protocols: Used for non-control data transmission. Examples include WiFi (transmitting aerial video and telemetry data, with limited range), Bluetooth (short-distance device interaction, such as setting parameters via a mobile phone), and DJI’s proprietary Lightbridge/OcuSync (integrating control and video transmission with strong anti-interference).

③ Navigation and monitoring protocols: Ensure positioning and flight safety, such as GPS/GLONASS (providing location information to support autonomous navigation) and ADSB (broadcasting positions between drones to avoid collisions).

2. What is a smart drone battery protocol? What are the common protocols?

A smart drone battery protocol is a “dedicated communication rule” between the battery and devices such as the flight controller and charger. It focuses on transmitting key information of the battery, such as voltage, temperature, remaining power, and health status, to ensure the safe and efficient operation of the battery.

According to the transmission method, common protocols are divided into three categories:

① Wired protocols: Transmitting data through direct wiring, which is stable and reliable. Examples include I2C (simple structure, low cost, used for basic monitoring of consumer drones), SMBus designed for power management (transmitting power and cycle count for models like DJI Mavic), CAN bus with high speed and long distance (real-time transmission of detailed data for industrial drones, such as single-cell battery voltage), and UART suitable for DIY (one-to-one simple communication).

② Wireless protocols: No physical wires, flexible and convenient. Examples include low-power BLE (checking battery status via mobile APP), high-speed WiFi (simultaneously transmitting battery data and video for high-end aerial cameras), and long-distance LoRaWAN (remote management of battery status for logistics drone fleets).

③ Manufacturer-specific protocols: Customized based on general protocols, such as DJI’s smart battery protocol (adding encryption verification and fast-charging collaboration to ensure compatibility only with original batteries).

3. Specific differences between drone protocols and smart drone battery protocols

Dimension	Drone Protocols	Smart Drone Battery Protocols
Functional purpose	Cover overall control and interaction of the drone (flight control, navigation, video transmission, etc.)	Focus on battery status monitoring and management (power, temperature, health status, etc.)
Data type	Flight commands, position, speed, sensor data, video, etc.	Voltage, current, remaining power, cycle count, fault alarms, etc.
Communication range	Can be long-distance (several kilometers, such as between remote controller and drone)	Short-distance (within a few meters in the aircraft or 100 meters via wireless)
Interaction objects	Remote controller, ground station, other drones, sensors, etc.	Battery management system (BMS), flight controller, charger
Complexity	Complex, requiring coordination of multiple subsystems	Simple, only processing battery-related data

4. Compatibility issues between drone protocols and smart drone battery protocols

Although their functions are different, compatibility is crucial to ensure the normal operation of the drone. The main issues include:

① Protocol mismatch: If the battery protocol is not supported by the drone’s flight controller, data exchange will fail. For example, if the drone only supports the I2C protocol while the battery is only compatible with the CAN bus, the flight controller cannot obtain the battery status, which may lead to risks such as loss of control due to low power. However, modern flight controllers usually support multiple protocols, and such problems can be avoided if the protocols of both parties are compatible (e.g., the battery uses the CAN bus and the drone supports it).

② Coordination issues in multi-protocol mixing: Drone systems often adopt different protocols for different subsystems (e.g., I2C for the battery and MAVLink for flight control), so it is necessary to ensure that various protocols can collaborate through conversion mechanisms. Without coordination, data delay or misinterpretation may occur. For example, the low-power alarm of the battery may fail to trigger the return-to-home command through the flight control protocol in time.

③ Interference and limitations of wireless protocols: When using wireless protocols (such as BLE and WiFi), the stability of battery data transmission is easily affected by environmental interference. For example, congested WiFi signals may cause delays in updating battery status, and the short-distance limitation of BLE may prevent the ground station from real-time monitoring of the battery status of long-distance drones.

④ Closure of manufacturer-specific protocols: Some brands (such as DJI) have proprietary battery protocols that are only compatible with original equipment. Using third-party batteries may result in failure to recognize the battery status due to protocol incompatibility, or even trigger safety protection mechanisms (such as prohibiting takeoff).

⑤ Reliability risks of conversion mechanisms: When protocols do not match, gateways or converters (e.g., converting CAN bus data to I2C) are required for communication. If the conversion device fails or has delays, battery data may be distorted, affecting the decision-making of the flight controller (e.g., misjudging sufficient power and continuing to fly).

Summary

Drone protocols are the “universal language” governing the overall system, while smart drone battery protocols are the “dedicated language” managing energy. They have clear divisions of labor but need to be compatible and collaborative. Compatibility risks such as protocol mismatch, multi-protocol coordination issues, and wireless interference may affect the safe operation of the drone. Therefore, when selecting devices or developing systems, priority should be given to ensuring protocol compatibility or having reliable conversion mechanisms.